[Computer-go] Facebook Go AI

[David Doshay]

This looks like GnuGo at level 1. Note things like filling at Q15, which GnuGo would not do on level 10 or higher.

Cheers,
David G Doshay

ddoshay at mac.com





> On 3, Nov 2015, at 8:31 AM, Marc Landgraf <mahrgell87 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> then again, Gnugo donked that game pretty badly. 
> Showing one game, where Gnugo just throws away the entire top before move 50 is not really telling about the overall strength, imho. Gnugo repeats the failure by suiciding the top right as well. 
> What is shown after is hard to evaluate, considering the score difference. The fact that the FB Bot prefers to play random moves in the center instead of removing the possible Ko in the lower left later is weird, but may be due to it's gigantic lead at this point.
> 
> Another interesting thing to note is, that the values shown on the right do not always correspond to the played moves. E.g. at move S17 (killing the top right) actually S16 had been give a higher score then the played S17
> 
> 2015-11-03 17:22 GMT+01:00 Aja Huang <ajahuang at google.com <mailto:ajahuang at google.com>>:
> Yes I checked the game. The agent looks pretty strong. It crushed GnuGo easily.
> 
> Aja
> 
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Rémi Coulom <remi.coulom at free.fr <mailto:remi.coulom at free.fr>> wrote:
> Can a strong player look at the video and give impressions about the game?
> 
> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>    Hi!
> 
>    Facebook is working on a Go AI too, now:
> 
>         https://www.facebook.com/Engineering/videos/10153621562717200/ <https://www.facebook.com/Engineering/videos/10153621562717200/>
>         https://code.facebook.com/posts/1478523512478471 <https://code.facebook.com/posts/1478523512478471>
>         http://www.wired.com/2015/11/facebook-is-aiming-its-ai-at-go-the-game-no-computer-can-crack/ <http://www.wired.com/2015/11/facebook-is-aiming-its-ai-at-go-the-game-no-computer-can-crack/>
> 
> The way it's presented triggers my hype alerts, but nevertheless:
> does anyone know any details about this?  Most interestingly, how
> strong is it?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go at computer-go.org <mailto:Computer-go at computer-go.org>
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go <http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go at computer-go.org <mailto:Computer-go at computer-go.org>
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go <http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Computer-go mailing list
> Computer-go at computer-go.org
> http://computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://computer-go.org/pipermail/computer-go/attachments/20151103/2431800f/attachment.html>