[Computer-go] Computer Go and EGC 2012

Richard J. Lorentz lorentz at csun.edu
Thu Jan 19 11:49:59 PST 2012


I agree with Don, though maybe not for all the same reasons. I also like 
his match idea, but I think it will be hard to get a pro to agree to it.

After reading all these posts I have concerns about this whole "game 
within a game" idea. It's beginning to look like the pro's behavior 
becomes part of the experiment, which you probably don't want as it 
would be demeaning to the pro. I suspect the original spirit was to make 
it as attractive as possible to the pro so that he will be likely to 
participate. This might be best done by offering the most money you can 
with what you think is the fairest handicap.

Just my 2 cents.

-Richard


On 1/19/2012 10:56 AM, Don Dailey wrote:
>
> ... Having said all of that I don't think letting the player pick his 
> own handicap is that good an idea.    Perhaps better is if you can get 
> him to agree to a longer match and raise and lower the handicap after 
> each game depending on the results.
>



More information about the Computer-go mailing list